<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Doodling for Charity: Doodle Day, May 8 Through May 18</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/doodling_for_charity_doodle_day_may_8_through_may_18/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:17:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Doodling for Charity: Doodle Day, May 8 Through May 18</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/05/13/doodling-for-charity-doodle-day-may-8-through-may-18/#comment-21313831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seth Godin recently had an interesting blog post about charity auctions that I discussed on the OYFP blog - basically his point was that the goal of such auctions is to get people to pay MORE than what it's worth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't speak for a doodle auction, though I always like clever ideas that are a little outside of the box. I've had photographs included in charity auctions for Kick for NIck - I think the winner paid about what it was worth ($30) considering it wasn't framed and I'm not a professional who typically sells her work. Maybe next time someone will go nuts and way over-bid.  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Casey @ OYFP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>