-
Website
http://consumerismcommentary.com/ -
Original page
http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/07/21/have-you-cut-your-expenses-due-to-gas-prices/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
¢entsiblelife
1 comment · 1 points
-
BDickson114
1 comment · 1 points
-
freeby50
2 comments · 1 points
-
ericabiz
4 comments · 12 points
-
Walt Breuninger
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
As to the original question, no, gas prices have no affecting our other spending. To some extent, being able to go against the flow can be very profitable. For example, automobiles that get relatively poor fuel economy can be had below long-term market averages.
We did buy a new big-screen TV this year, though. We spent less than $1500. :)
We always aim to be more frugal in general, and a couple of years ago got rid of the interest expense incurred by paying for car insurance by the month. We now pay it by the year.
i live by a lake and have noticed that people have really cut back on boating. that is a pretty big luxury gas item. a guy at the pump the other day had to fill his wakeboard boat (60 gallon tank) with premium at $5.50 and it was costting him over $300. and boats are not fuel effecient at all.
i am still amazed at how people are buying smaller cars for minimal mileage improvements. have you seen the smart car? i looked at one of those and figured if I was going to risk my life by driving one of those, i should get about 100 mpg...nope, only 36!! A gas nissan altima gets 32. And a hybrid altima doesn't get any better on the freeway..only in city driving. well, if you are in a city, can't you bike or walk easier and cheaper than you can drive an altima to get the 35 city mpg?? anyhow, enough of my rant....
i know this will sound bad, but I would like to see gas at about $8 a gallon. would eliminate the waste (especially by those that can't afford it) in this country and would move us towards alternatives.
one other note: I was riding my bike and some of my friends were as well to try to help out/cut costs, and what we noticed is that nothing in our society is set up to accomodate bikes or pedestrians. everything is designed for car traffic. in addition, cars are not looking for you on a bike, and it is really dangerous biking around at commute times and lunch times as people in cars are in a hurry. it will take years before our infrastructure is designed for pedestrian/bike traffic. car/bike accidents are WAY up where I live. you have to ask yourself if saving some money on gas is worth risking your life in a tiny car or on a bike.....and at this point the answer for me is no.
On July 18th oil closed at $128.88 . An increase of 121% in roughly 1 3/4 years.
Why do you suppose that oil men where only able to increase the price of a barrel of oil only 76% in 6 years. Yet the moment they lost control of Congress it more than doubled in far less time?
Speculators know very well that one party is far more resistant to drilling in this country. When that party took control of one part of our government the speculators bet that it was going to be far more difficult for oil companies to drill in the U.S.
With production falling world wide, a serious threat to domestic production in office and world consumption growing. Prices were ready to rally and that is exactly what they did. Add the subprime housing crisis and a weak dollar and the run was on.
When one side wants more drilling and the other wants none and both refuse to budge their position. The speculators were going to get very rich.
Hinting that a few individuals with ties to oil companies is scapegoating the issue. Congress holds just as much fault on the high price of gas as does the current presidential administration.
As for the price of gas affecting my life. I borrowed $140,000 on 0% credit cards earlier this year and put it in a couple of high yield on line savings accounts. The price of gas will have to go above $5.35 just equal what I am making in after tax interest from those accounts. All the high price of gas did was eat into some of the arbitrage money I was making.
My Econ 101 text has a few nice and succint charts with two intersecting lines representing supply and demand which used to reflect a law about how pricing was determined. It appears according to this statement that this law has been repealed by some powerful and evil oil men. This is distressing to me as this law seems to have been important to the current economic system.
To that end I think this needs some serious and immediate attention. Specifically it would be very helpful if you could advance this issue by immediately investigating and reporting back on the following two critical issues:
1. What actions did the evil oil individuals take which repealed this law and thus helped the evil oil companies and in turn resulted in sky rocketing oil and gas prices?
2. What actions would the saintly oil hating individuals be able to take which could immediately reverse this lining of the evil oil companies pockets and reinstate this economic law, thus resulting in a return of the $1.40 gasoline that existed before the evil oil individuals implemented their evil plans?
A few things you may want to consider while investigating these issues.
1. World wide oil production had a large surge in the late 90s outstripping demand that resulted in oil cratering to $10 per barrel.
2. The evil Dick Chenny (then president of the evil Haliburton oil company) publicly stated that $10 oil was both unsustainable and damaging to the long term energy supply situation as it would stifle exploration because it was unprofitable for oil companies to explore and even expand production at those prices. He was then and later vilified and blamed as having somehow wanted to take money from hardworking individuals to give to evil oil companies because he dared to discuss some basic economics that people think somehow does not apply to the oil industry.
3. Global oil demand has been rising rapidly over the past 6 or so years especially with rapid industrialization of India and China. This demand caught up to production in the mid 2000's
4. Global oil production peaked in late 2005 at about 85 million barrels per day even as worldwide demand has continued to expand far beyond current production levels. As of yet we have been unable to increase that level of production because some of the major world oil wells are getting old and less efficient and certain groups and political ideologies in a particular North American Super Power country are unwilling to allow any increase in any locally available production in that country.
Hopefully these facts will help you to flesh out the connections between the evil oil men and the evil oil companies that are maniacally engineering the economic fleeceing of the populace for their own magliomanic ends.
Before buying our Subaru Forester, we'd considered a Toyota Corolla. We later noticed that it is no longer so highly rated by Consumer Reports, and what I noticed about it is that the design does not lend itself to good visibility (especially when backing up), and the defroster does not work the way I think it ought to. The dealer said to turn on both the heat and the A/C in order to clear the windows. I don't know exactly how long that would take, as I didn't have the patience to find out, but it doesn't sound right to have to do that. It also made me wonder just how well the A/C would work, an extremely important consideration in California. By contrast, the Subaru defrosts perfectly, and the A/C is very good. Better gas mileage with a defective car wouldn't make me happy.
If I had to drive my own vehicle everyday, I would certainly have to adjust my expenses. The first expense to go would probably be cable.
We're talking about personal expenses and spending habits here, not politics. Thanks!
We *would* be merely talking about personal expenses if you hadn't tried to use language to unfairly associate the administration with higher gas prices. If you don't want a political discussion then don't try to sneak political commentary into personal finance articles ;-)
hmmm, call me silly.
http://www.ioga.com/Special/crudeoil_Hist.htm
Oil price history:
12/1998 $8.64
11/2000 $31.16 (election month)
01/2001 $28.66 (inauguration month)
oil prices tripled in the last 3 years of the previous administration prior to the election and inauguration of the current administration.
07/2001 $23.58 - 6 months in prices are down.
01/2002 $16.65 - 1 year in prices are cut in half.
07/2002 $23.69 - 18 months in prices are still down.
01/2003 $29.44 - 2 years in prices are basically unchanged.
07/2003 $27.39 - 2.5 years in prices are still slightly down.
01/2004 $30.87 - 3 years in prices are basically unchanged.
07/2004 $36.25 - 3.5 years in prices are up about 25%.
01/2005 $42.21 - 4 years in prices are up about 50%.
07/2005 $52.13 - 4.5 years in prices are up about 75%.
01/2006 $58.30 - 5 years in prices are about doubled.
07/2006 $66.28 - 5.5 years in prices are up about 125%.
01/2007 $46.53 - 6 years in prices are up about 65%.
07/2007 $65.96 - 6.5 years in prices are up about 125%.
01/2008 $84.70 - 7 years in prices are up about 175%.
06/2007 $126.33 - 7.5 years in prices are up about 300%.
So to recap.
Prices tripled under the last 2 years of the previous administration.
Prices got cut in half under the first year of the current administration.
prices were flat for the first 3 years of the current administration.
prices were up moderately in the first 4-5 years of the current administration.
and prices are jumping wildly in the last year of the current administration.
They sure are some tricky evil oil people. Lowering prices just to suck us in and then smack us with the big increases.
So why did you choose the time period of the last 8 years? Why not the last 10 years. Prices are up 12 fold in that time.
Why not the last 4 years, because thats when the increase you are talking about occurred because it wasn't there for most of the first term of the current administration.
I guess 8 years was just a random number that you choose which happens not to correspond with the beginnings of an increase in price but does happen to correspond with another event which you apparently had no political reasons for choosing.
===> "I did not say it was “caused by” the administration. I also didn’t say the price increase wasn’t a function of supply and demand."
Indeed. The only thing you did say is that one event was "eerily" coinciding with another. Now not having given any reason for including such eeriness, what should a rational non political thinking person conclude was the reason for including the eerie statement about the coinciding? If you believed the price changes were a simple function of supply demand would you have included a comment about eerie things that coincide? And if so to what end other than to confuse readers into thinking that you think the eerie coinciding is somehow responsible for the event that it is coinciding with? For example, you could have said eerily coinciding with the time frame since the xbox has been introduced. What should one conclude from that statement? I can think of two choices. 1. He thinks the xbox is responsible for increasing energy prices, or 2. He is making a random association which makes no sense.
Do you make a habit of including random associations in your posts that don't relate to the topic you are talking about and don't reflect your true feelings on the topic? That would be a bit odd and might lead to the kind of complete misunderstanding of your true viewpoint that you seem to now be implying has occurred here. Because according to your last comment you seem a bit bothered that people apparently misinterpreted your statement as a political commentary of your own beliefs or opinions about a cause and effect relationship between the current administration and oil prices instead of a supply demand relationship.
I am glad we cleared that up and understand now that what you really meant was the thing that you did not say about supply demand. Meanwhile what you did say about eerie coinciding was just a fact that happens not to relate to anything (even though we have shown by the price history that the "fact" is off by about 3-4 years of time window)
I'm sure my salary will never reach the spending power it used to have. I think America is experiencing an "adjustment" right now, as we become a poorer nation. Here's something to think about: The Indian outsourcing company, Wipro, which has displaced Americans in the IT industry due to cheap labor, is now hiring developers in America. What does THAT say about our economy:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/...
Sorry you were personally offended by the offhand political comment.
I'll have to think about what my opinion is about the Xbox's effect on energy prices. Intriguing suggestion. More people playing video games, particularly with fancy multimedia equipment like high definition televisions and powerful surround sound audio systems, must surely increase demand for energy. Let's blame the video-game-playing kids. :-)
Everyone: Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it's interesting to hear about changes people are (or aren't) making to adjust to new gas prices. (Any off-topic commentary henceforth will be deleted.)
I HAVE changed my habits though. I've started "hypermiling" - but not drastically. I take my foot off the gas sooner on my way to a stop light. I coast when I can and I use cruise control at a constant speed. Although I still have to use my AC so the savings aren't that great right now.
I also started clipping coupons like a fiend. I saved more than $50 recently on my grocery bill and that is a tank of gas for my Rav4. We also try to think about the trips we take but honestly we still drive about the same. Though I have postponed errands to be able to combine trips into one.