<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/is_finding_6000_in_saved_expenses_better_than_a_raise/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:32:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/08/15/is-finding-6000-in-saved-expenses-better-than-a-raise/#comment-21315242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think finding a way to save $6k of your money is better than getting a $6k raise, based on the fact that you have already paid taxes on your money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The better solution though, is to find a way to do a little of each. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickle young</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/08/15/is-finding-6000-in-saved-expenses-better-than-a-raise/#comment-21315241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course it's better to save $6k, for exactly the tax reasons already stated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's keep it simple.  Suppose you have $50 in hand, and you HAVE TO buy things that currently cost $100.  So how do you get there?  Well, if you can find a sale, or a substitute, and "save" $50 so that your $100-worth costs you only $50, then you're home free.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But suppose you don't go that route.  Suppose you take the $50 in hand, and then you go out and earn your other $50.  You're there, right?  $50 + 50 = $100.  Um... NO.  That second $50 is fully taxable.  So that second $50 is really only (let's say) $40.  So in scenario 1, you have all the cash you need; in scenario 2 you have $50 + 40 = 90 but you're trying to buy $100 worth of stuff.  Good luck-- maybe the store owner LOVES YOU and will give you a discount?  If not, where's that $10 coming from?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A penny saved is NOT a penny earned.  A penny saved is a TAX-FREE penny earned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/08/15/is-finding-6000-in-saved-expenses-better-than-a-raise/#comment-21315240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Credit card arbitrage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Easy way to make lots of extra dollars.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/08/15/is-finding-6000-in-saved-expenses-better-than-a-raise/#comment-21315239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think finding a way to save $6k of your money is better than getting a $6k raise, based on the fact that you have already paid taxes on your money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The better solution though, is to find a way to do a little of each. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/08/15/is-finding-6000-in-saved-expenses-better-than-a-raise/#comment-21315238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, sure, for a lot of people this kind of thing is pretty useful. But for a lot of the kind of people who read this blog are probably not going to be able to get much in the way of these low-hanging-fruit savings. Bank fees? Phone costs? Are you kidding me? I looked, and not one of their suggestions applied to me at all, except - arguably - food shopping; admittedly, I'm single and without responsibilities, so I don't even have life insurance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Finding $6,000 in Saved Expenses Better Than a Raise?</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/08/15/is-finding-6000-in-saved-expenses-better-than-a-raise/#comment-21315237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think saving $6000 is better than getting a $6000 raise, but I do think it is easier. If you want to improve your cash flow, you have two conceivable options: (a) you can spend less, and (b) you can earn more. Option (b) is quite often not available. The only thing you can control for sure are your expenses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This also reminds me of business school. The professor of controlling made sure that we got the following point. It is easier to save $1 dollar somewhere within the organization which goes straight to the bottom line than it is to earn another $1, only part of which makes it to the bottom line.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vilkri</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:18:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>