<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Money Magazine: No Fees? Get It in Writing!</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/money_magazine_no_fees_get_it_in_writing/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:51:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Money Magazine: No Fees? Get It in Writing!</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/08/29/money-magazine-no-fees-get-it-in-writing/#comment-21308502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great call - getting it in writing means at least some degree of protection.  Fee options for planners range far &amp;amp; wide e.g. fee-only per product sold or an annual fee based on your assets or wrap fees where management fees + annual percentages + fee-based amounts are rolled into one charge ... or hourly charges or annual retainers.  So when an adviser says they won't charge, confirming it in writing is a sharp move, since the fee discussion may not be as face-value or overt as one would hope.  I think I'll videoblog on this further!  Thx for these posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jill Foster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>