-
Website
http://consumerismcommentary.com/ -
Original page
http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/04/18/most-wealthy-individuals-earned-not-inherited-their-wealth/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
¢entsiblelife
1 comment · 1 points
-
BDickson114
1 comment · 1 points
-
freeby50
2 comments · 1 points
-
ericabiz
4 comments · 12 points
-
Walt Breuninger
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
A lot of the answers are to be expected. People who work hard their whole life and who have that type of investment capital NOW, have not always been that way. They have grown comfortable with their money over a long time. People who receive a windfall or inherit, often have not had the opportunity to grow comfortable with increasing capital over a long time, and thus that huge chunk of money is like a foreign object to them. Earners know how they lived early on, and though it isn't ideal, they could return to a lifestyle they once knew if they had to. However, odds are they haven't changed it a LOT, much as people who inherit or receive a windfall do. Earners probably still live in a moderate home compared to their wealth, while large inheritances and windfalls cause large decisions.
On the risk factor - risk is what got the earner to this point. They are more comfortable with it because they've been able to see it's longer-term effects. Even if it's just 20 years worth. The heirs, on the other hand, may have had much less exposure to the long term benefits, and thus witnessing a wild swing in the market and its effect on their stash is going to be harsh, painful, and not able to be looked at with a long-term view.
Regarding wealth "causing more problems than it solves." Just as "The Millionaire Next Door" revealed - often you don't even KNOW who the millionaire is. Thus, if people are not perceived as being very wealthy, it doesn't attract as much of the negative attention. Inheritance and windfalls are MUCH more visible, and thus attract more negative attention.
I wish the article had given more details - average age of the two groups, and average investment capital (not just "over" $500,000). Perhaps they didn't have an ideal cross-section, but I think those details would have helped interpret the answers a bit better.
Earn or inherit? Like you, I'll take earn if I have a choice but wouldn't decline anything that came my way should some long lost relative pick me to inherit a fortune.
Think about that. Only 25% of people born into wealth consider it luck. Did they choose their parents?
1- I married him, I may never see a dime of that money - so I really have very little stake in his inheritance at this point.
2 - This money may never materialize - his parents may blow it (not likely), may need a significant portion for their care (again, unlikely they'll need it ALL), he has 2 other brothers that may see the inheritance before we do.
In other words a lot can happen. His parents are in their early 60s and likely will live another 20 years. His mother is a petite woman who exercises daily and eats organic and very healthy - she's got many years ahead of her. Personally I'm not willing to wait 20 years to be comfortable. By taking control of finances now we can reach that goal in 20 years on our own accord. Why wait on an inheritance that could not materialize? Whatever we receive in the future is just lagniappe. No one should sit and wait on an inheritance.
1. The amount is actually very small: $500k is not wealthy ... even add personal assets and bring that to $1 Mill. and we are talking about a 'safe' withdrawal level of perhaps $40k a year.
2. The truly wealthy were surveyed in a very recent book that shows that most Ultra-High-Net-Worth and Mega Rich ($5 Mill. to $25m+) have about a third of their assets in a business; another third in real-estate (including own home/s); the final third in stocks etc.
3. I don't consider any of these ideal benchmarks to be aiming for, they are just how the 'mediocre average' of multimillionaires happen to have ended up ... fortunately, for most of them this kind of 'mediocrity' is good enough ... otherwise they wouldn't be included in the surveys!
4. I can understand how those who made their own money would find the stress levels much lower and the happiness levels much higher: they have achieved a major (probably, lifetime) goal!
I can assure you that I will be much happier having made my own money than my own two Ugly Sisters, who have been 'lucky' enough to get handouts from a mother who has just inherited.
So, yeah, MOST MILLIONAIRES earned their own money; but MOST of the RICHEST people inherited a huge chunk of it. These are not contradictory statements.