<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Peek Into Supreme Court Nominee&amp;#8217;s Portfolio</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/peek_into_supreme_court_nominee8217s_portfolio/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:01:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Peek Into Supreme Court Nominee&amp;#8217;s Portfolio</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/07/26/peek-into-supreme-court-nominees-portfolio/#comment-21298889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just wanted to mention Alan Greenspan's allocation: 100% U.S. Treasuries.  I'd rather own those than keep $2 million in the bank.  Why would you want four different money market funds?  They're all the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noumenon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>