<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/publicly_shame_a_deadbeat/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:49:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see how a site like this might be effective, but I have moral problems with the premise.  Damn you, morals!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:49:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with mapgirl.  Sueing anonymous users will get you nothin, maybe another bill from your lawyer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill M</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Instead of this, why not re-institute debtor's prison? Because suing someone for slander and libel on an anonymous website doesn't really get a debt paid does it? Just look all those deadbeat dads who don't pay child support. Their names go up on public websites, but does it really get all of them to pay? (I'm sure some do, but certainly not all. Many go on  being deadbeats.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mapgirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see how this can be abused y some people. How can they prove the debt is real?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Green Panda</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hear the terms "libel", "slander", and "defamation" coming!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if the owner is not responsible, those who post there will be.  Plus, any complaintant who asks for their name to be removed from a public website not controlled by the government who is not granted that respect can call up a site's ISP, lodge a complaint, and have the site taken down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This one won't last, boys ;) The owner will be inundated with lawsuits, and even if he's found to be "innocent" (how can one who facilitates be innocent?), the time and money he'll spend off work and with lawyers will kill him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes, the suit is not won by the facts, but by the lack of energy on one party's part.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chad: It's my understanding that there is a federal law that protects website operators from liability for content posted by visitors and users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harlan Landes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:05:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can not see anything good coming from this...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/24/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/#comment-21317155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not sure how this can be legal.  Sure, they can do it, but are there not fair credit reporting laws preventing many of the things that will be posted here?   Aren't they setting themselves up for a ton of lawsuits whenever false information is published?  It seems like they would be liable if false information were published.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad Bordeaux</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:36:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>