http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/NoneenMon, 25 Dec 2006 17:40:27 -0000http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/02/28/schadenfreude/#comment-21300943<p>I think you forgot a key point here: Lay's fortune was not made because he was a hard worker or because he was a business genius or because he was investing smartly.</p><p>His fortune was built on sand as it was the result of defrauding others: employees and investors.</p><p>So, in your case, I would not call your sentiment "Schadenfreude" but simply justice served.</p>PatriceMon, 25 Dec 2006 17:40:27 -0000http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/02/28/schadenfreude/#comment-21300942<p>Lay deserves it.</p>jimTue, 28 Feb 2006 10:58:47 -0000http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/02/28/schadenfreude/#comment-21300941<p>I think something's wrong -- I didn't get that email you mention. ;-)</p>FMFTue, 28 Feb 2006 10:37:52 -0000