<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Seven Home Equity Tips, Part 5: Get the Tax Deduction</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/seven_home_equity_tips_part_5_get_the_tax_deduction/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:54:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Seven Home Equity Tips, Part 5: Get the Tax Deduction</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/08/24/seven-home-equity-tips-part-5-get-the-tax-deduction/#comment-21308472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a little misleading.  The $100,000 limit on home equity debt does not apply if the money is used for home acquisition or home improvement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's also important to note that HELOC or second mortgage debt that doesn't qualify as home acquisition debt is not deductible at all if you are subject to AMT.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:54:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Home Equity Tips, Part 5: Get the Tax Deduction</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/08/24/seven-home-equity-tips-part-5-get-the-tax-deduction/#comment-21308471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never quite understand the 'its good for taxes' arguments on mortgage products.  I agree with you that staying out of debt is the best choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Happy Rock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>