-
Website
http://consumerismcommentary.com/ -
Original page
http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/12/16/the-federal-reserve-cut-is-irrelevant/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
¢entsiblelife
1 comment · 1 points
-
BDickson114
1 comment · 1 points
-
freeby50
2 comments · 1 points
-
ericabiz
4 comments · 12 points
-
Walt Breuninger
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Also if banks have lots of cash they can lend that money out to customers so rates go down in the "real world" too, although we don't get the same same rate as the inter-bank rates.
How do they print money? They buy back loans, or T-bills, on the open market. In that way they inject cash into the system. To remove money they sell T-bills.
No modern government "prints" money anymore. Now the banks create most of the money in the economy through loans. Which is why the credit-crunch hurts so much ... all the money dryed up. This is not cash money, so it's not the same kind of money that the federal reserve adjusts. This is money on the books of banks.
The Fed doesn't have unlimited leverage for these kinds of activities because it costs a lot, but there are others it can use too. For example, if banks can't borrow from other banks then they can always go to the Fed. If the Fed sets a very low interest rate then other banks have to follow suit from an interbank view anyway, but that doesn't change the money supply. Another way is that they can change the rules for banks to allow them to have lower cash reserves, and then the banks can .. viola .. create new money on their own.
I think those other levers would be worse.
Consumer credit ought to be illegal, but the rest of the economy runs on credit too.
The ones who print money are the banks because they are allowed to lend more than they have.
You could print money too between you and your friends just by making loans to each other, as long as you all agree you are good for it. You lend Jimmy $100 and he give you an IOU for $100. Wham-o, you just created $100. Jimmy can spend the $100 because it's cash, and you can spend the hundred because your friends will always be willing to spot you cash on the strength of the IOU.from Jimmy that you hold. You can probably sell Jimmy's IOU to Lucy saying "Hey I need $100 this weekend, have this IOU and Jimmy will just pay you back instead of me." Or you just write your own IOU to Lucy, say if you only need $10. After awhile there might be a few IOUS is circulation.
That $100 IOU from Jimmy and the $10 from you are only good between you and your friends, but when banks do it it's good everywhere.
The credit crunch comes when Lucy asks for her $10 cash. No problem, you say, I'll just get paid from Jimmy and pay you back. Only Jimmy doesn't have the cash. Jimmy's bankrupt and he's not your friend anymore. No problem, I'll just write another IOU to Sally or Bill for the $10 to pay back Lucy, except Sally or Bill don't have extra cash to lend you either. So now you're bankrupt too, and Lucy hates you. But Lucy's probably in the same boat and owes someone else money. Everyone goeas bunkrupt because there is not enough cash money amongst all of you to cover all the IOUs.
That's what happens when the credit system fails.
The current financial problems are not really rooted on how much money is available - there is plenty. The problem is that the velocity of money has slowed down tremendously. Everybody starting with the banks is sitting on cash. Before the crisis money was sent from one account to the next in ever shorter intervals. Now money is just stuck in one account. So, the fed has to make up for slower moving money by "printing" more and more of it. Eventually this will lead to inflation, but that is a heck of a lot better than deflation which is a real danger right now.