<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in The New Bankruptcy Bill</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/the_new_bankruptcy_bill/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:17:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The New Bankruptcy Bill</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/03/10/the-new-bankruptcy-bill/#comment-21298258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's be a little more reasonable here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; First of all not all people who have trouble paying their debts are "foolish and irresponsible" as you imply. They may have had a medical catastrophy for a member of their family or they may have lost their job. I can think of many instances that life thows our way where one can get caught up in economic trouble.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondly, The banks who push credit cards on people who are bad risks are largely at fault for even offering credit to these people in the first place. This is especially true for elder retired Senior citizens who are living on fixed incomes and are facing outrageous medical costs and who do not understand the nature of  a credit trap especially at 20% + interest rates. Credit cards are offered and maintained by these immoral stinking banks who do not care where their next sucker comes from. CitiBank is one of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:17:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Bankruptcy Bill</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/03/10/the-new-bankruptcy-bill/#comment-21298257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The $1B would be in the way of fees.  That's how the companies end up with a $1B gift -- it's money the credit card companies didn't have to pay the retailers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Flexo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Bankruptcy Bill</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/03/10/the-new-bankruptcy-bill/#comment-21298256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm inclined to agree with Jim.  We live in an era where debt is the norm and there is no accountability for it.  You can run up huge debts because it simply doesn't matter anymore.  Sure, there are consequences, but they're not severe enough to make most people even think twice before spending money they don't and never will have.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren R. Sussman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Bankruptcy Bill</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/03/10/the-new-bankruptcy-bill/#comment-21298255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Advocacy groups claim that itâ€™s a gift to credit card companies, who stand to gain $1 billion or more."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think they should make a point that the $1B isn't really a gift, it's money that's owed to them anyway by foolish and irresponsible spenders. Making it harder for people to run up debt and simply run out on responsibility is a good thing. Credit card companies never forced anyone to use their cards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:35:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>