-
Website
http://consumerismcommentary.com/ -
Original page
http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2009/03/11/traditional-vs-roth-ira-introduction-comparison/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
¢entsiblelife
1 comment · 1 points
-
BDickson114
1 comment · 1 points
-
freeby50
2 comments · 1 points
-
ericabiz
4 comments · 12 points
-
Walt Breuninger
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
If I ever move companies I will set up a traditional IRA with Fidelity foe to rollover. I like vanguard but I always like to diversify my accounts across institutions.
Lower MARGINAL tax rate than your EFFECTIVE tax rate than you retire. Big, big difference.
Nevertheless, future tax rates are nearly impossible to predict, particularly if you're looking forward 30 years or more like many people who are just starting with IRAs.
Actually, as long as you meet the basic requirements of the Roth (at least 59 & 1/2 years old and had the account for 5+ years), the capital gains are tax free. Otherwise, there'd be little difference between a Roth and a regular non tax-advantaged account.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_IRA
I'm no expert, but if you're 59 1/2 and have had the account for more than 5 years, don't you get everything out of our Roth IRA tax free? That's the whole point, you put after tax money in and all of your growth comes out tax free later. Have I been completely misunderstanding the differences between Traditional or Roth or is Flexo wrong?
Downside, of course, is that Sharebuilder doesn't have access to Vanguard's mutual funds if you DO want to go that route, which is much cheaper for dollar-cost-averaging.