<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Consumerism Commentary - Latest Comments in Weakness in Manhattan</title><link>http://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://consumerismcommentary.disqus.com/weakness_in_manhattan/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:08:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Weakness in Manhattan</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/04/04/weakness-in-manhattan/#comment-21301306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;120-130/sq ft is the valuation around my area in MD when I was looking for a house (about a year ago). Like Hazzard, $1k+/sq ft seems insane... then again, you get quite a bit for your buck in NYC. (and you typically get more buck too!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weakness in Manhattan</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/04/04/weakness-in-manhattan/#comment-21301305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.&lt;br&gt;That makes my $150 per square foot valuation seem reasonable.  When I bought my house, it was approximately $103 per square foot.  I just can't comprehend how someone could afford $1000 per square foot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hazzard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>